#StopRansomware: Rhysida Ransomware

Posted by:

|

On:

|

SUMMARY

Note: This joint Cybersecurity Advisory (CSA) is part of an ongoing #StopRansomware effort to publish advisories for network defenders detailing various ransomware variants and ransomware threat actors. These #StopRansomware advisories include recently and historically observed tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) and indicators of compromise (IOCs) to help organizations protect against ransomware. Visit stopransomware.gov to see all #StopRansomware advisories and to learn more about other ransomware threats and no-cost resources.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) are releasing this joint CSA to disseminate known Rhysida ransomware IOCs and TTPs identified through investigations as recently as September 2023. Rhysida—an emerging ransomware variant—has predominately been deployed against the education, healthcare, manufacturing, information technology, and government sectors since May 2023. The information in this CSA is derived from related incident response investigations and malware analysis of samples discovered on victim networks.

FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC encourage organizations to implement the recommendations in the Mitigations section of this CSA to reduce the likelihood and impact of Rhysida ransomware and other ransomware incidents.

Download the PDF version of this report:

TECHNICAL DETAILS

Note: This advisory uses the MITRE ATT&CK® for Enterprise framework, version 14. See the ATT&CK Tactics and Techniques section for tables mapped to the threat actors’ activity.

Overview

Threat actors leveraging Rhysida ransomware are known to impact “targets of opportunity,” including victims in the education, healthcare, manufacturing, information technology, and government sectors. Open source reporting details similarities between Vice Society (DEV-0832)[1] activity and the actors observed deploying Rhysida ransomware. Additionally, open source reporting[2] has confirmed observed instances of Rhysida actors operating in a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) capacity, where ransomware tools and infrastructure are leased out in a profit-sharing model. Any ransoms paid are then split between the group and the affiliates.

For additional information on Vice Society actors and associated activity, see the joint CSA #StopRansomware: Vice Society.

Initial Access

Rhysida actors have been observed leveraging external-facing remote services to initially access and persist within a network. Remote services, such as virtual private networks (VPNs), allow users to connect to internal enterprise network resources from external locations. Rhysida actors have commonly been observed authenticating to internal VPN access points with compromised valid credentials [T1078], notably due to organizations lacking MFA enabled by default. Additionally, actors have been observed exploiting Zerologon (CVE-2020-1472)—a critical elevation of privileges vulnerability in Microsoft’s Netlogon Remote Protocol [T1190]—as well as conducting successful phishing attempts [T1566]. Note: Microsoft released a patch for CVE-2020-1472 on August 11, 2020.[3]

Living off the Land

Analysis identified Rhysida actors using living off the land techniques, such as creating Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) connections for lateral movement [T1021.001], establishing VPN access, and utilizing PowerShell [T1059.001]. Living off the land techniques include using native (built into the operating system) network administration tools to perform operations. This allows the actors to evade detection by blending in with normal Windows systems and network activities.

Ipconfig [T1016], whoami [T1033], nltest [T1482], and several net commands have been used to enumerate victim environments and gather information about domains. In one instance of using compromised credentials, actors leveraged net commands within PowerShell to identify logged-in users and performed reconnaissance on network accounts within the victim environment. Note: The following commands were not performed in the exact order listed.

  • net user [username] /domain [T1087.002]
  • net group “domain computers” /domain [T1018]
  • net group “domain admins” /domain [T1069.002]
  • net localgroup administrators [T1069.001]

Analysis of the master file table (MFT)[4] identified the victim system generated the ntuser.dat registry hive, which was created when the compromised user logged in to the system for the first time. This was considered anomalous due to the baseline of normal activity for that particular user and system. Note: The MFT resides within the New Technology File System (NTFS) and houses information about a file including its size, time and date stamps, permissions, and data content.

Leveraged Tools

Table 1 lists legitimate tools Rhysida actors have repurposed for their operations. The legitimate tools listed in this joint CSA are all publicly available. Use of these tools should not be attributed as malicious without analytical evidence to support they are used at the direction of or controlled by threat actors.

Disclaimer: Organizations are encouraged to investigate and vet use of these tools prior to performing remediation actions.

Table 1: Tools Leveraged by Rhysida Actors

Name

Description

cmd.exe

The native command line prompt utility.

PowerShell.exe

A native command line tool used to start a Windows PowerShell session in a Command Prompt window.

PsExec.exe

A tool included in the PsTools suite used to execute processes remotely. Rhysida actors heavily leveraged this tool for lateral movement and remote execution.

mstsc.exe

A native tool that establishes an RDP connection to a host.

PuTTY.exe

Rhysida actors have been observed creating Secure Shell (SSH) PuTTy connections for lateral movement. In one example, analysis of PowerShell console host history for a compromised user account revealed Rhysida actors leveraged PuTTy to remotely connect to systems via SSH [T1021.004].

PortStarter

A back door script written in Go that provides functionality for modifying firewall settings and opening ports to pre-configured command and control (C2) servers.[1]

secretsdump

A script used to extract credentials and other confidential information from a system. Rhysida actors have been observed using this for NTDS dumping [T1003.003] in various instances.

ntdsutil.exe

A standard Windows tool used to interact with the NTDS database. Rhysida actors used this tool to extract and dump the NTDS.dit database from the domain controller containing hashes for all Active Directory (AD) users.

Note: It is strongly recommended that organizations conduct domain-wide password resets and double Kerberos TGT password resets if any indication is found that the NTDS.dit file was compromised.

AnyDesk

A common software that can be maliciously used by threat actors to obtain remote access and maintain persistence [T1219]. AnyDesk also supports remote file transfer.

wevtutil.exe

A standard Windows Event Utility tool used to view event logs. Rhysida actors used this tool to clear a significant number of Windows event logs, including system, application, and security logs [T1070.001].

PowerView

A PowerShell tool used to gain situational awareness of Windows domains. Review of PowerShell event logs identified Rhysida actors using this tool to conduct additional reconnaissance-based commands and harvest credentials.

Rhysida Ransomware Characteristics

Execution

In one investigation, Rhysida actors created two folders in the C: drive labeled in and out, which served as a staging directory (central location) for hosting malicious executables. The in folder contained file names in accordance with host names on the victim’s network, likely imported through a scanning tool. The out folder contained various files listed in Table 2 below. Rhysida actors deployed these tools and scripts to assist system and network-wide encryption.

Table 2: Malicious Executables Affiliated with Rhysida Infections

File Name

Hash (SHA256)

Description

conhost.exe

6633fa85bb234a75927b23417313e51a4c155e12f71da3959e168851a600b010

A ransomware binary.

psexec.exe

078163d5c16f64caa5a14784323fd51451b8c831c73396b967b4e35e6879937b

A file used to execute a process on a remote or local host.

S_0.bat

1c4978cd5d750a2985da9b58db137fc74d28422f1e087fd77642faa7efe7b597

A batch script likely used to place 1.ps1 on victim systems for ransomware staging purposes [T1059.003].

1.ps1

4e34b9442f825a16d7f6557193426ae7a18899ed46d3b896f6e4357367276183

Identifies an extension block list of files to encrypt and not encrypt.

S_1.bat

97766464d0f2f91b82b557ac656ab82e15cae7896b1d8c98632ca53c15cf06c4

A batch script that copies conhost.exe (the encryption binary) on an imported list of host names within the C:WindowsTemp directory of each system.

S_2.bat

918784e25bd24192ce4e999538be96898558660659e3c624a5f27857784cd7e1

Executes conhost.exe on compromised victim systems, which encrypts and appends the extension of .Rhysida across the environment.

Rhysida ransomware uses a Windows 64-bit Portable Executable (PE) or common object file format (COFF) compiled using MinGW via the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), which supports various programming languages such as C, C++, and Go. The cryptographic ransomware application first injects the PE into running processes on the compromised system [T1055.002]. Additionally, third-party researchers identified evidence of Rhysida actors developing custom tools with program names set to “Rhysida-0.1” [T1587].

Encryption

After mapping the network, the ransomware encrypts data using a 4096-bit RSA encryption key with a ChaCha20 algorithm [T1486]. The algorithm features a 256-bit key, a 32-bit counter, and a 96-bit nonce along with a four-by-four matrix of 32-bit words in plain text. Registry modification commands [T1112] are not obfuscated, displayed as plain-text strings and executed via cmd.exe.

Rhysida’s encryptor runs a file to encrypt and modify all encrypted files to display a .rhysida extension.[5] Following encryption, a PowerShell command deletes the binary [T1070.004] from the network using a hidden command window [T1564.003]. The Rhysida encryptor allows arguments -d (select a directory) and -sr (file deletion), defined by the authors of the code as parseOptions.[6] After the lines of binary strings complete their tasks, they delete themselves through the control panel to evade detection.

Data Extortion

Rhysida actors reportedly engage in “double extortion” [T1657]—demanding a ransom payment to decrypt victim data and threatening to publish the sensitive exfiltrated data unless the ransom is paid.[5],[7] Rhysida actors direct victims to send ransom payments in Bitcoin to cryptocurrency wallet addresses provided by the threat actors. As shown in Figure 1, Rhysida ransomware drops a ransom note named “CriticalBreachDetected” as a PDF file—the note provides each company with a unique code and instructions to contact the group via a Tor-based portal.

Figure 1: Rhysida Ransom Note
Figure 1: Rhysida Ransom Note

Identified in analysis and also listed in open source reporting, the contents of the ransom note are embedded as plain-text in the ransom binary, offering network defenders an opportunity to deploy string-based detection for alerting on evidence of the ransom note. Rhysida threat actors may target systems that do not use command-line operating systems. The format of the PDF ransom notes could indicate that Rhysida actors only target systems that are compatible with handling PDF documents.[8]

INDICATORS OF COMPROMISE

On November 10, 2023, Sophos published TTPs and IOCs identified from analysis conducted for six separate incidents.[9] The C2 IP addresses listed in Table 3 were derived directly from Sophos’ investigations and are listed on GitHub among other indicators.[10]

Table 3: C2 IP Addresses Used for Rhysida Operations

C2 IP Address

5.39.222[.]67

5.255.99[.]59

51.77.102[.]106

108.62.118[.]136

108.62.141[.]161

146.70.104[.]249

156.96.62[.]58

157.154.194[.]6

Additional IOCs were obtained from FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC’s investigations and analysis. The email addresses listed in Table 4 are associated with Rhysida actors’ operations. Rhysida actors have been observed creating Onion Mail email accounts for services or victim communication, commonly in the format: [First Name][Last Name]@onionmail[.]org.

Table 4: Email Addresses Used to Support Rhysida Operations

Email Address

rhysidaeverywhere@onionmail[.]org

rhysidaofficial@onionmail[.]org

Rhysida actors have also been observed using the following files and executables listed in Table 5 to support their operations.

Disclaimer: Organizations are encouraged to investigate the use of these files for related signs of compromise prior to performing remediation actions.

Table 5: Files Used to Support Rhysida Operations

File Name

Hash (SHA256)

Sock5.sh

48f559e00c472d9ffe3965ab92c6d298f8fb3a3f0d6d203cd2069bfca4bf3a57

PsExec64.exe

edfae1a69522f87b12c6dac3225d930e4848832e3c551ee1e7d31736bf4525ef

PsExec.exe

078163d5c16f64caa5a14784323fd51451b8c831c73396b967b4e35e6879937b

PsGetsid64.exe

201d8e77ccc2575d910d47042a986480b1da28cf0033e7ee726ad9d45ccf4daa

PsGetsid.exe

a48ac157609888471bf8578fb8b2aef6b0068f7e0742fccf2e0e288b0b2cfdfb

PsInfo64.exe

de73b73eeb156f877de61f4a6975d06759292ed69f31aaf06c9811f3311e03e7

PsInfo.exe

951b1b5fd5cb13cde159cebc7c60465587e2061363d1d8847ab78b6c4fba7501

PsLoggedon64.exe

fdadb6e15c52c41a31e3c22659dd490d5b616e017d1b1aa6070008ce09ed27ea

PsLoggedon.exe

d689cb1dbd2e4c06cd15e51a6871c406c595790ddcdcd7dc8d0401c7183720ef

PsService64.exe

554f523914cdbaed8b17527170502199c185bd69a41c81102c50dbb0e5e5a78d

PsService.exe

d3a816fe5d545a80e4639b34b90d92d1039eb71ef59e6e81b3c0e043a45b751c

Eula.txt

8329bcbadc7f81539a4969ca13f0be5b8eb7652b912324a1926fc9bfb6ec005a

psfile64.exe

be922312978a53c92a49fefd2c9f9cc098767b36f0e4d2e829d24725df65bc21

psfile.exe

4243dc8b991f5f8b3c0f233ca2110a1e03a1d716c3f51e88faf1d59b8242d329

pskill64.exe

7ba47558c99e18c2c6449be804b5e765c48d3a70ceaa04c1e0fae67ff1d7178d

pskill.exe

5ef168f83b55d2cbd2426afc5e6fa8161270fa6a2a312831332dc472c95dfa42

pslist64.exe

d3247f03dcd7b9335344ebba76a0b92370f32f1cb0e480c734da52db2bd8df60

pslist.exe

ed05f5d462767b3986583188000143f0eb24f7d89605523a28950e72e6b9039a

psloglist64.exe

5e55b4caf47a248a10abd009617684e969dbe5c448d087ee8178262aaab68636

psloglist.exe

dcdb9bd39b6014434190a9949dedf633726fdb470e95cc47cdaa47c1964b969f

pspasswd64.exe

8d950068f46a04e77ad6637c680cccf5d703a1828fbd6bdca513268af4f2170f

pspasswd.exe

6ed5d50cf9d07db73eaa92c5405f6b1bf670028c602c605dfa7d4fcb80ef0801

psping64.exe

d1f718d219930e57794bdadf9dda61406294b0759038cef282f7544b44b92285

psping.exe

355b4a82313074999bd8fa1332b1ed00034e63bd2a0d0367e2622f35d75cf140

psshutdown64.exe

4226738489c2a67852d51dbf96574f33e44e509bc265b950d495da79bb457400

psshutdown.exe

13fd3ad690c73cf0ad26c6716d4e9d1581b47c22fb7518b1d3bf9cfb8f9e9123

pssuspend64.exe

4bf8fbb7db583e1aacbf36c5f740d012c8321f221066cc68107031bd8b6bc1ee

pssuspend.exe

95a922e178075fb771066db4ab1bd70c7016f794709d514ab1c7f11500f016cd

PSTools.zip

a9ca77dfe03ce15004157727bb43ba66f00ceb215362c9b3d199f000edaa8d61

Pstools.chm

2813b6c07d17d25670163e0f66453b42d2f157bf2e42007806ebc6bb9d114acc

psversion.txt

8e43d1ddbd5c129055528a93f1e3fab0ecdf73a8a7ba9713dc4c3e216d7e5db4

psexesvc.exe

This artifact is created when a user establishes a connection using psexec. It is removed after the connection is terminated, which is why there is no hash available for this executable.

MITRE ATT&CK TACTICS AND TECHNIQUES

See Tables 6-15 for all referenced threat actor tactics and techniques in this advisory. For assistance with mapping malicious cyber activity to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, see CISA and MITRE’s Best Practices for MITRE ATT&CK Mapping and CISA’s Decider Tool.

Additional notable TTPs have been published by the Check Point Incident Response Team.[11]

Table 6: Resource Development

Technique Title

ID

Use

Develop Capabilities

T1587

Rhysida actors have been observed developing resources and custom tools, particularly with program names set to “Rhysida-0.1” to gain access to victim systems.

Table 7: Initial Access

Technique Title

ID

Use

Valid Accounts

T1078

Rhysida actors are known to use valid credentials to access internal VPN access points of victims.

Exploit Public-Facing Application

T1190

Rhysida actors have been identified exploiting Zerologon, a critical elevation of privilege vulnerability within Microsoft’s Netlogon Remote Protocol.

Phishing

T1566

Rhysida actors are known to conduct successful phishing attacks.

Table 8: Execution

Technique Title

ID

Use

Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell

T1059.001

Rhysida actors used PowerShell commands (ipconfig, nltest, net) and various scripts to execute malicious actions.

Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell

T1059.003

Rhysida actors used batch scripting to place 1.ps1 on victim systems to automate ransomware execution.

Table 9: Privilege Escalation

Technique Title

ID

Use

Process Injection: Portable Executable Injection

T1055.002

Rhysida actors injected a Windows 64-bit PE cryptographic ransomware application into running processes on compromised systems.

Table 10: Defense Evasion

Technique Title

ID

Use

Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs

T1070.001

Rhysida actors used wevtutil.exe to clear Windows event logs, including system, application, and security logs.

Indicator Removal: File Deletion

T1070.004

Rhysida actors used PowerShell commands to delete binary strings.

Hide Artifacts: Hidden Window

T1564.003

Rhysida actors have executed hidden PowerShell windows.

Table 11: Credential Access

Technique Title

ID

Use

OS Credential Dumping: NTDS

T1003.003

Rhysida actors have been observed using secretsdump to extract credentials and other confidential information from a system, then dumping NTDS credentials.

Modify Registry

T1112

Rhysida actors were observed running registry modification commands via cmd.exe.

Table 12: Discovery

Technique Title

ID

Use

System Network Configuration Discovery

T1016

Rhysida actors used the ipconfig command to enumerate victim system network settings.

Remote System Discovery

T1018

Rhysida actors used the command net group “domain computers” /domain to enumerate servers on a victim domain.

System Owner/User Discovery

T1033

Rhysida actors leveraged whoami and various net commands within PowerShell to identify logged-in users.

Permission Groups Discovery: Local Groups

T1069.001

Rhysida actors used the command net localgroup administrators to identify accounts with local administrator rights.

Permission Groups Discovery: Domain Groups

T1069.002

Rhysida actors used the command net group “domain admins” /domain to identify domain administrators.

Account Discovery: Domain Account

T1087.002

Rhysida actors used the command net user [username] /domain to identify account information.

Domain Trust Discovery

T1482

Rhysida actors used the Windows utility nltest to enumerate domain trusts.

Table 13: Lateral Movement

Technique Title

ID

Use

Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol

T1021.001

Rhysida actors are known to use RDP for lateral movement.

Remote Services: SSH

T1021.004

Rhysida actors used compromised user credentials to leverage PuTTy and remotely connect to victim systems via SSH.

Table 14: Command and Control

Technique Title

ID

Use

Remote Access Software

T1219

Rhysida actors have been observed using the AnyDesk software to obtain remote access to victim systems and maintain persistence.

Table 15: Impact

Technique Title

ID

Use

Data Encrypted for Impact

T1486

Rhysida actors encrypted victim data using a 4096-bit RSA encryption key that implements a ChaCha20 algorithm.

Financial Theft

T1657

Rhysida actors reportedly engage in “double extortion”— demanding a ransom payment to decrypt victim data and threatening to publish the sensitive exfiltrated data unless the ransom is paid.

MITIGATIONS

FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC recommend that organizations implement the mitigations below to improve your organization’s cybersecurity posture. These mitigations align with the Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPGs) developed by CISA and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The CPGs provide a minimum set of practices and protections that CISA and NIST recommend all organizations implement. CISA and NIST based the CPGs on existing cybersecurity frameworks and guidance to protect against the most common and impactful threats, and TTPs. Visit CISA’s Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals for more information on the CPGs, including additional recommended baseline protections.

These mitigations apply to all critical infrastructure organizations and network defenders. FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC recommend incorporating secure-by-design and -default principles, limiting the impact of ransomware techniques and strengthening overall security posture. For more information on secure by design, see CISA’s Secure by Design webpage.

  • Require phishing-resistant MFA for all services to the extent possible, particularly for webmail, VPN, and accounts that access critical systems [CPG 2.H].
  • Disable command-line and scripting activities and permissions. Privilege escalation and lateral movement often depend on software utilities running from the command line. If threat actors are not able to run these tools, they will have difficulty escalating privileges and/or moving laterally [CPG 2.N].
  • Implement verbose and enhanced logging within processes such as command line auditing[12] and process tracking[13].
  • Restrict the use of PowerShell using Group Policy and only grant access to specific users on a case-by-case basis. Typically, only those users or administrators who manage the network or Windows operating systems should be permitted to use PowerShell [CPG 2.E].
  • Update Windows PowerShell or PowerShell Core to the latest version and uninstall all earlier PowerShell versions. Logs from Windows PowerShell prior to version 5.0 are either non-existent or do not record enough detail to aid in enterprise monitoring and incident response activities [CPG 1.E, 2.S, 2.T].
  • Enable enhanced PowerShell logging [CPG 2.T, 2.U].
    • PowerShell logs contain valuable data, including historical operating system and registry interaction and possible TTPs of a threat actor’s PowerShell use.
    • Ensure PowerShell instances (using the latest version) have module, script block, and transcription logging enabled (e.g., enhanced logging).
    • The two logs that record PowerShell activity are the PowerShell Windows event log and the PowerShell operational log. FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC recommend turning on these two Windows event logs with a retention period of at least 180 days. These logs should be checked on a regular basis to confirm whether the log data has been deleted or logging has been turned off. Set the storage size permitted for both logs to as large as possible.
  • Restrict the use of RDP and other remote desktop services to known user accounts and groups. If RDP is necessary, apply best practices such as [CPG 2.W]:
    • Implement MFA for privileged accounts using RDP.
    • Use Remote Credential Guard[14] to protect credentials, particularly domain administrator or other high value accounts.
    • Audit the network for systems using RDP.
    • Close unused RDP ports.
    • Enforce account lockouts after a specified number of attempts.
    • Log RDP login attempts.
  • Secure remote access tools by:
    • Implementing application controls to manage and control execution of software, including allowlisting remote access programs. Application controls should prevent the installation and execution of portable versions of unauthorized remote access and other software. A properly configured application allowlisting solution will block any unlisted application execution. Allowlisting is important as antivirus solutions may fail to detect the execution of malicious portable executables when the files use any combination of compression, encryption, or obfuscation.
    • Apply the recommendations in CISA’s joint Guide to Securing Remote Access Software.

In addition, FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC recommend network defenders apply the following mitigations to limit potential adversarial use of common system and network discovery techniques, and to reduce the impact and risk of compromise by ransomware or data extortion actors:

  • Keep all operating systems, software, and firmware up to date. Timely patching is one of the most efficient and cost-effective steps an organization can take to minimize its exposure to cybersecurity threats. Prioritize patching known exploited vulnerabilities in internet-facing systems [CPG 1.E].
  • Segment networks to prevent the spread of ransomware. Network segmentation can help prevent the spread of ransomware by controlling traffic flows between—and access to—various subnetworks and by restricting adversary lateral movement [CPG 2.F].
  • Identify, detect, and investigate abnormal activity and potential traversal of the indicated ransomware with a network monitoring tool. To aid in detecting ransomware, implement a tool that logs and reports all network traffic, including lateral movement activity on a network. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools are particularly useful for detecting lateral connections as they have insight into common and uncommon network connections for each host [CPG 3.A].
  • Audit user accounts with administrative privileges and configure access controls according to the principle of least privilege (PoLP) [CPG 2.E].
  • Implement time-based access for accounts set at the admin level and higher [CPG 2.A, 2.E]. For example, the just-in-time (JIT) access method provisions privileged access when needed and can support the enforcement of PoLP (as well as the zero trust model). This is a process where a network-wide policy is set in place to automatically disable admin accounts at the AD level when the account is not in direct need. Individual users may submit their requests through an automated process that grants them access to a specified system for a set timeframe when they need to support the completion of a certain task.
  • Implement a recovery plan to maintain and retain multiple copies of sensitive or proprietary data and servers in a physically separate, segmented, and secure location (e.g., hard drive, storage device, or the cloud).
  • Maintain offline backups of data and regularly maintain backups and their restoration (daily or weekly at minimum). By instituting this practice, organizations limit the severity of disruption to business operations [CPG 2.R].
  • Ensure all backup data is encrypted, immutable (i.e., cannot be altered or deleted), and covers the entire organization’s data infrastructure [CPG 2.K, 2.L, 2.R].
  • Forward log files to a hardened centralized logging server, preferably on a segmented network [CPG 2.F]. Review logging retention rates, such as for VPNs and network-based logs.
  • Consider adding an email banner to emails received from outside your organization [CPG 2.M].
  • Disable hyperlinks in received emails.

VALIDATE SECURITY CONTROLS

In addition to applying mitigations, FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC recommend exercising, testing, and validating your organization’s security program against the threat behaviors mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK for Enterprise framework in this advisory. FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC recommend testing your existing security controls inventory to assess how they perform against the ATT&CK techniques described in this advisory.

To get started:

  1. Select an ATT&CK technique described in this advisory (see Tables 6-15).
  2. Align your security technologies against the technique.
  3. Test your technologies against the technique.
  4. Analyze your detection and prevention technologies’ performance.
  5. Repeat the process for all security technologies to obtain a set of comprehensive performance data.
  6. Tune your security program, including people, processes, and technologies, based on the data generated by this process.

FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC recommend continually testing your security program, at scale, in a production environment to ensure optimal performance against the MITRE ATT&CK techniques identified in this advisory.

RESOURCES

REPORTING

FBI is seeking any information that can be shared, to include boundary logs showing communication to and from foreign IP addresses, a sample ransom note, communications with Rhysida actors, Bitcoin wallet information, decryptor files, and/or a benign sample of an encrypted file.

Additional details requested include: a targeted company point of contact, status and scope of infection, estimated loss, operational impact, transaction IDs, date of infection, date detected, initial attack vector, and host and network-based indicators.

FBI and CISA do not encourage paying ransom as payment does not guarantee victim files will be recovered. Furthermore, payment may also embolden adversaries to target additional organizations, encourage other threat actors to engage in the distribution of ransomware, and/or fund illicit activities. Regardless of whether you or your organization have decided to pay the ransom, FBI and CISA urge you to promptly report ransomware incidents to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) at Ic3.gov, a local FBI Field Office, or CISA via the agency’s Incident Reporting System or its 24/7 Operations Center at report@cisa.gov or (888) 282-0870.

REFERENCES

  1. Microsoft: DEV-0832 (Vice Society) Opportunistic Ransomware Campaigns Impacting US Education Sector
  2. FortiGuard Labs: Ransomware Roundup – Rhysida
  3. Microsoft: Security Update Guide – CVE-2020-1472
  4. Microsoft: Master File Table (Local File Systems)
  5. SentinelOne: Rhysida
  6. Secplicity: Scratching the Surface of Rhysida Ransomware
  7. Cisco Talos: What Cisco Talos Knows about the Rhysida Ransomware
  8. SOC Radar: Rhysida Ransomware Threat Profile
  9. Sophos: A Threat Cluster’s Switch from Vice Society to Rhysida
  10. Sophos: Vice Society – Rhysida IOCs (GitHub)
  11. Check Point Research: Rhysida Ransomware – Activity and Ties to Vice Society
  12. Microsoft: Command Line Process Auditing
  13. Microsoft: Audit Process Tracking
  14. Microsoft: Remote Credential Guard

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Sophos contributed to this CSA.

DISCLAIMER

The information in this report is being provided “as is” for informational purposes only. FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC do not endorse any commercial entity, product, company, or service, including any entities, products, or services linked within this document. Any reference to specific commercial entities, products, processes, or services by service mark, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC.

VERSION HISTORY

November 15, 2023: Initial version.

Posted by

in